Showing posts with label diet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diet. Show all posts

Thursday, 19 June 2014

Weight loss may be hard, but it’s not impossible — you just need your own ‘lightning rod moment’ to decide it’s time


Weight loss may be hard, but it’s not impossible — you just need your own ‘lightning rod moment’ to decide it’s time

 |  | Last Updated: Jun 19 2:02 PM ET
More from Jennifer Syg
o
Fotolia
A recent report that hit headlines last week suggests permanent weight loss is impossible. That may sound depressing, but first let’s consider a few things that were glossed or ignored in the story.
The piece, referencing the work of Traci Mann, a psychologist who runs an eating lab at the University of Minnesota, has led to the inevitable debate in the health and diet communities. And while it is, in many ways, reflective of the often gruesome stats that surround weight loss, we should be use caution before we consider it the final word on our battle on obesity.
Let’s be clear: For most people, most of the time, weight loss is very difficult. Or, to put it more accurately, while weight loss isn’t easy, keeping it off is hard. And yes, it can be a step away from impossible; for example, in the case of those with morbid obesity, we have better evidence in favour of bariatric surgery than we do for traditional diet and exercise (the best evidence is for a combination of the two). It is also true that the body, in many ways, conspires against you once you’ve lost the weight. Your appetite-stimulating hormone, ghrelin, goes up, encouraging to you to eat more, and your resting metabolic rate drops, meaning you’re burning fewer calories at rest than you did before you lost weight — and that’s just the start of it. Perhaps more importantly, restrictive diets make cravings more intense, putting you in the perfect position to binge when left all alone with the cookie jar.


So, if we know that weight loss is hard, and that several biological factors are stacked against us, why even try?

First, let’s take a step back and remind ourselves that, when it comes to weight, an ounce of prevention is worth many pounds of a cure. If we can help adolescents, children, and according to mounting evidence, even unborn babies in the womb maintain a healthier weight, then their odds are much better than if we try to undo the effects of weight gain years later. So keeping off weight to begin with is an obvious goal, if sometimes a hidden one.
Despite all of this, however, weight loss for those who’ve already put on pounds is still possible. And yes, it is even possible to keep it off, too. I’ve witnessed this numerous times, not only in my practice, but also in my own home. My own husband lost 60 pounds in his post-university years, and has kept it off for more than a decade. He actually weighs less now than he did in high school. How did he do it? It started with a six-week backpacking trip to Europe. We were cash-strapped (read: poor), so we had no choice but to walk everywhere, make food at our hostels where possible, and eat small, inexpensive (and occasionally sketchy) meals from sidewalk vendors. We climbed our first mountain — literally — and carried our packs on our backs.
By the end of the trip, he had lost about 15 pounds, but the real change happened when we got home. After years of relying on occasional trips to the gym to stay fit, my husband took up running, and found a true passion for the sport. He also did something equally, or perhaps more, important: he ate his last McDonald’s meal in Heathrow Airport and never went back. That was his lightning rod moment — the time when it became crystal clear what he needed to do.
Of course, I am aware of the obvious criticism of this story. After all, it’s just a one-off example of one person’s weight loss, set against myriad failed attempts reported in scientific literature. But not coincidentally, my husband’s weight loss follows very closely with the trends reported by the U.S. National Weight Control Registry, which, since 1994, has tracked and studied people who have lost at least 30 pounds and kept it off for at least a year. On average, these individuals report exercising about an hour per day (usually walking), and 98% of them modified their food intake in some way to control their weight. About two-thirds of them watch less than 10 hours of TV per week, and three-quarters of them keep track of their weight to make sure things don’t get out of hand.
Of course, the concept is simple, and the actual doing is the hard part.
When our eating habits are so closely tied to our lifestyle, our emotions, the eating habits of those around us, and we have easy access to cheap, high calorie, highly palatable foods, the odds are stacked against us. In my mind, the question should not be, is weight loss possible, but rather, what can we do both individually and as a society to encourage the habits that are needed to maintain a healthy weight to become the norm. Some of these changes might be small — getting TVs and smartphones out of bedrooms to ensure better sleep would be one example — and others will be harder — planning better communities with access to walking, biking, and public transit would go a long way to getting people moving more — but we owe it to ourselves and the generations to come to take the necessary steps to help people help themselves.
—Jennifer Sygo, MSc., RD, is a registered dietitian and sports nutritionist at Cleveland Clinic Canada, and author of the newly released nutrition book Unmasking Superfoods (HarperCollins, $19.99). Visit her on the Web at jennifersygo.com and send your comments and nutrition-related questions to her at info@jennifersygo.com.

Tuesday, 10 June 2014

HEALTH ALERT: Implementing Successful Sodium Reduction

Implementing Successful Sodium Reduction
Sodium chloride plays many functional roles in foods, including texture improvement, color enhancement and microbial control.

Besides imparting a salty flavor, sodium chloride enhances other flavors in the food. How sodium chloride does this is not fully understood, which makes mimicking sodium’s flavor qualities a tad more challenging.

Researchers are aware of one mechanism responsible for at least some of detection of the salty taste via sodium—the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). Finding a compound to target this salty receptor is more difficult than finding high-potency sweeteners to interact with sweet receptors, largely because the receptor is very specific for sodium and for lithium.

Instead, a possibility is to find an enhancer that can keep the ENaC open longer or make fewer molecules of sodium more effective. This has worked with the amino acid arginine, but its high cost has made it an unlikely option.
However, research has shown consumers are regulating salty taste themselves by sprinkling salt on top of low-sodium food. Assuming the food industry can overcome the functional difficulties in reducing sodium in breads, cheeses and meats, sprinkling the surface with a little salt can boost the flavor.

Yeast ingredients can bolster umami, specifically providing a savory, indulgent taste. Although yeast extract is not sodium free, low usage rates can minimize sodium contribution. And though mushrooms themselves can’t reduce sodium, chemicals and compounds from mushrooms can be extracted to increase perceived saltiness in meat, bakery and in topical applications.

For a closer look at sodium reduction—and the strategies used to enhance perceived saltiness of foods—download the free Digital Issue, “Strategies for Reduced-Sodium Formulations."

Sunday, 8 June 2014

Innovations Driving Global Chocolate Confectionery Growth

Innovations Driving Global Chocolate Confectionery Growth
 - Blogs
Print


Innovations of new products in dark chocolate and milk chocolate segment with new flavors and low-calorie chocolates will help drive moderate growth of the U.S. retail chocolate industry to an estimated $19.3 billion by 2018, according to a trends and forecast report from Research and Markets.

Consumers’ concern of obesity and related health risks serve as challenges to increasing category sales. In deciding to buy chocolate, 89 percent of consumers buy it as a treat or reward and 87 percent buy it as a snack option, while 83 percent of consumers look at the size of chocolate candy packages to determine the best value for the money and 72 percent buy chocolate to improve their mood or provide an energy boost.

Major manufacturers realized the importance of consumer’ concerns and launched miniature versions of their major brands in 2013 to help drive sales among the growing snacking sector. Snacking in-between meals has become more common as a simple way to stay satiated all day and smaller bite-sized portions help fill the snacking desire. The smaller pieces allow for increased calorie control on the part of the consumer who might think an entire chocolate bar is too much.

(FPD Factoid: in 2013 lower-calorie food products drove 82% of the sales growth among the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation (HWCF) member CPG companies, increasing $1.25 billion, compared to less than $300 million for high-calorie products.)

In the United States, the chocolate confectionery is dominated by two companies—The Hershey Co. and Mars, Inc.—that accounted for a combined 65% share of overall value sales. Euromonitor International predicts the U.S. chocolate confectionery market will have constant value growth of 7 percent between 2013 and 2018; however, higher prices and smaller pack sizes are expected to drive retail volume sales down by 1 percent over the forecast period.

Looking at the bigger picture, the global retail chocolate industry is growing at an impressive rate and is expected reach $117.3 billion by 2018, with the milk chocolate segment predicted to emerge as the largest-growth market.

Consumer awareness of the many health benefits of chocolate will be a key driver of industry growth. Vitamin- and calcium-rich sugar-free chocolates, dark chocolate, and organic and natural products are some products expected to escalate the global chocolate industry toward high growth rates in future. In terms of health and wellness concerns, consumers are embracing low-calorie or sugar-free chocolate products.

While global concern about obesity and wellness, manufacturers need to pay special attention to designing great tasting lower-calorie chocolate products that will keep consumers wanting more. With each generation of high-intensity sweeteners improving upon the last, reducing both the sugar and the calories in sweets has become less of a dream and more of a reality. The trend in confections is to reduce calories and reduce sugar, but one can’t be reduced without the other because sugar is where calories are, yet it is also where sweetness is. Find out how product designers are accomplishing this in the “Confections for a Slimmer Society" Slide Show from Food Product Design’s FoodTech Toolbox.

And for something a little offbeat, check out “Seeing the Light: Holographic Chocolate"  to learn how food science and physics came together to make hologram chocolates out of molding technology and the properties of light.

Saturday, 7 June 2014

Pitaya: The Exotic Fruit with Health Benefits





Pitaya: 

The Exotic 







Yellow Pitaya is available to fruit wholesalers by BRANDAID Food Inc. on a fly-in program out of Bogata, Columbia.  Contact bmacdonald@brandaidfood.com


Written by: 

Whenever I hear someone refer to superfoods as only rare and expensive items, often available in powders and tinctures, I always roll my eyes. Please. To me, superfoods are abundant everywhere. My definition of superfoods are that they are whole plant foods that have numerous health benefits, and include a whole array of phytonutrients, including vitamins, minerals, fiber and antioxidants. “Superfoods” have powerful healing qualities and should be a core staple of our daily diet… but once again, they are abundant everywhere. To me, spinach is a superfood. So are kale, lemons, sunflower seeds, etc. They do not have to come from across the world.
All that being said, I still like to talk about “exotic” fruits as well, which too can fall into the superfoods category. By exotic, they may grow in some far off places resides the US, but I guess it mostly means that they look a whole lot different than typical oranges and apples. It can be fun to mix different plant foods into your diet, and it is also good to get a wide range. I was thinking about this one in particular, Pitaya, aka dragon fruit, because I saw it here in Los Angeles. Seeing it reminded me of also eating it in Thailand, where I would get it (along with a bounty of other Asian fruit) at the street markets practically every day I was there.
It is one weird looking and oddly beautiful fruit. On the outside, Pitaya has a deep pinkish red color (although one variety of the fruit is golden yellow) with green scaly leaves. On the inside (the part you eat) you will find flesh ranging from white to deep red spotted with small seeds.

Dragon Fruit Nutrition

Grown in California, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia, Pitaya is the fruit of a cactus plant. Nutrition for the dragon fruit includes:
  • 60 calories per 100 gram serving
  • 1 gram of fiber per serving
  • 9 grams of carbohydrates per serving
  • The fruit’s edible seeds contain heart healthy monounsaturated fats and omega-3 fatty acids.
  • Studies show dragon fruit is a significant source of antioxidants, which can prevent free radical damage that can lead to premature aging and disease.
  • The fruit is high in many important micronutrients such as vitamin C, calcium, and vitamin A.

Pitaya Health Benefits

There are interesting studies featuring this exotic fruit, which show that  pitaya may have other health benefits, as well.
  • One study showed that dragon fruit had a notable impact on oxidative stress and aortic stiffness in diabetic rats, suggesting the fruit may be beneficial at preventing complications associated with diabetes.
  • The same study indicates regular consumption of dragon fruit may lower the risks of developing heart disease and developing high blood pressure.
  • Dragon fruit is high in antioxidants. Studies show that antioxidants may be effective at lowering risk of certain types of cancer.
  • The seeds contain omega-3 fats. A great deal of research shows that omega-3 fatty acids can fight inflammation and autoimmune diseases.
  • Because of its nutritional makeup, including antioxidants, monounsaturated fats, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and fiber, pitaya is a beauty-enhancing fruit.

Eating Pitaya

Because pitaya is a fruit, it moves very rapidly through your digestive system. In The Beauty Detox Solution, I recommend eating fruit first thing in the day or on an empty stomach so your body can make the most of the beneficial nutrients and enzymes. You don’t want fruit to get stuck beyond a heavier food, where it can begin to ferment in your system and create toxins. This same rule goes for dragon fruit.
You can eat pitaya alone, or you can include it in delicious smoothies.
Pitaya Smoothie
  • Flesh of one dragon fruit
  • 1 cup banana
  • 1 cup coconut water
  • 1″ ginger nub water
You can also eat the pitaya by itself. To prepare a pitaya:
  1. Cut the fruit in half, lengthwise.
  2. Using a large spoon, scoop out the pitaya’s flesh.
  3. Trim away any extra inedible skin.
  4. Cut into cubes and eat or use in smoothies or fruit salads.

Taste and Texture

Dragon fruit has a pretty mild taste, especially in contrast to its rather extreme looks! It is similar to melon in its taste and texture, and it’s not too sweet. The flavor is quite delicate with pear-like notes. If you buy a pink-fleshed pitaya, your smoothies will have a vibrant, beautiful color.

Where to Buy

I’ve seen dragon fruit in the produce aisle at many grocery stores. You can also find it at Whole Foods, in produce stands, or in its dried form at many natural food stores. I recommend buying organic dragon fruit and reading dried fruit labels to ensure no sugar or chemicals have been added.

Tuesday, 20 May 2014

FDA Approves High-Intensity Sweetener Advantame

FDA Approves High-Intensity Sweetener Advantame
 - Blogs
Print


FDA today announced the new food additive, advantame, is safe for use as a general-purpose sweetener and flavor enhancer in food, marking the 6th high-intensity sweetener approved by FDA.

Made from vanillin and aspartame, Advantame is a free-flowing, water soluble, white crystalline powder that is stable even at higher temperatures, and can be used as a tabletop sweetener as well as in cooking applications. Advantame can be used in baked goods, non-alcoholic beverages (including soft drinks), chewing gum, confections and frostings, frozen desserts, gelatins and puddings, jams and jellies, processed fruits and fruit juices, toppings and syrups.

Before approving Advantame, FDA reviewed data from 37 animal and human studies to identify possible toxic effects, such as reproductive, neurological and cancer-causing effects. FDA concluded the ingredient is safe for human consumption under the petitioned conditions of use.

Sugar reduction is all the rage these days. Which is no surprise, considering consumers are avoiding sugar (according the 2014 IFIC Food and Health Survey, 51 percent of Americans are trying to limit or avoid added sugars).

According to Ajinomoto, Advantame’s manufacutrer, taste panels show that in some beverages, sweetness from caloric sweeteners may be reduced up to 30 percent with no difference in perceived flavor and sweetness with the addition of Advantame.

Blending sweeteners has long been a tactic used to improve flavor and enhance sweetness in reduced-calorie or reduced-sugar foods. Food Product Design spoke with Eric Walters, associate dean, research, and professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy at Rosalind Franklin University, on the topic. Check out the FoodTech Toolbox video, “Sweetener Blends," to find out more about how blending sweeteners can improve taste and overall finished product quality.


Sources:

Sunday, 18 May 2014

HEALTH ALERT: Added Sugars Not Linked to Mortality Risk

Added Sugars Not Linked to Mortality Risk
 - Blogs
Print


A study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition shows that added sugars may not increase the risk of mortality.

Scientists gathered dietary data from 353,751 people, ages 50–71, and then tracked how many of them died from diseases such as cancer and heart disease over 13 years. Intake of individual sugars over the previous 12 months was assessed at baseline by using a 124-item National Institutes of Health (NIH) Diet History Questionnaire.

The researchers found that women who consumed the greatest amount of added sugars didn't have an elevated risk of mortality. However, the women who ate the most fructose faced a slightly higher chance of dying during the study period. It should be noted that this study shows association, not causation.

The researchers concluded that “In this large prospective study, total fructose intake was weakly positively associated with all-cause mortality in both women and men, whereas added sugar, sucrose, and added sucrose intakes were inversely associated with other-cause mortality in men. In our analyses, intake of added sugars was not associated with an increased risk of mortality."

Added sugars have been a hot topic of late (the American Beverage Association recently refuted a study by CDC that linked added sugar intake and cardiovascular disease mortality). And FDA has proposed revising the Nutrition Facts label to include “added sugars" (check out this infographic in the Food Product Design FoodTech Toolbox for specifics).

Luckily, industry has already been working hard at sugar reduction. Take, for example, product innovations like PepsiCo’s Trop50 brand—a blend of juice and water and sweetened with stevia—which has seen immense success in the United States. In the Food Product Design Content Library, “Reducing Added Sugars" dives into the complexities behind sugar reduction—including FDA’s guidelines as to what warrants a “reduced-sugar" claim, what consumers are actually looking for in reduced-sugar foods and beverages and how to replace sugar’s functional benefits (in addition to its taste).


Sources:

HEALTH ALERT: More Americans Choose Foods Based on Healthfulness Rachel Adams

IFIC 2014 Survey: More Americans Choose Foods Based on Healthfulness
 - Blogs
Print


The number of American consumers who consider healthfulness when purchasing their food and beverages has shown a significant uptick in the past two years, according to the IFIC Foundation’s 2014 Food and Health Survey.

American consumers’ perceptions and behaviors regarding the healthfulness of their diets and level of physical activity are among the survey’s most encouraging findings. While taste and price consistently have been the top two factors that impact consumers’ food and beverage purchases (90 percent and 73 percent respectively), healthfulness in 2014 almost entirely closed the gap with price, rising from 61 percent of consumers in 2012 to 71 percent this year, a 10 percentage-point increase.

And so, how do consumers define “healthfulness?" More than four out of five (83 percent) report that they’ve tried to eat more fruits and vegetables either within the past year or for more than a year. Seventy-nine percent say they have cut calories by drinking water or low- and no-calorie beverages. Seventy-two percent are eating more whole grains. In addition, four in five report that they are trying either to lose weight (54 percent) or maintain their weight (25 percent).

Topping the list of what respondents believe to be the most effective weight-management strategy included eating smaller portions at 26 percent, and eating smaller and more frequent meals or snacks at 23 percent.

The survey also revealed what nutrients or food components consumers are trying to limit or increase consumption of. The components and the number of respondents who are trying to get a certain amount or as much as possible of them are: fiber (53 percent), whole grains (53 percent), protein (50 percent), calcium (36 percent), omega-3 fats (21 percent), potassium (19 percent), and probiotics (18 percent).

In terms of those nutrients or components consumers are trying to limit or avoid entirely: sodium/salt (53 percent), sugars in general (50 percent), calories (48 percent), fats/oils (29 percent), caffeine (31 percent), and mono/polyunsaturated fats (26 percent).

While still a majority, significant declines were seen among respondents who believe moderate amounts of sugar can be part of an overall healthful diet (74 percent in 2014 vs. 84 percent in 2013) and those who believe people with diabetes can include some foods with sugar as part of their total diet (54 percent in 2014 vs. 71 percent in 2013). Half of consumers (51 percent) report that they are getting “pretty close to" or less than what they believe is the appropriate amount of sugars in their diets.

It appears that consumers are starting to understand the significance of functional foods, even if they don’t completely grasp the concept. Foods fortified with protein, fiber and other nutrients are considered “healthful." However, consumers are also demanding these foods contain fewer added sugars (or less sugar altogether), along with less sodium, fats and calories. It’s a tall order, no doubt.

The process of including bioactive compounds in food and beverage products is complex, as food manufacturers must examine their shelf life, stability and bioavailability before processing. Food Product Design recently discussed these obstacles in its free Digital Issue, “Functional Foods," which dives into topics like healthier energy ingredients, cereal nutrition and omega-3s, among others, to get product formulation on track not only with taste, but nutrition as well.

And luckily, innovation in sweetening ingredients is putting sugar reduction within reach. Non-nutritive, “natural" sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit can reduce added sugars and calories in food and beverages. For more information on these sweetening ingredients (and others), check out this report from the Food Product Design FoodTech Toolbox.


Sources:

Saturday, 17 May 2014

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: Seeing the Light: Holographic Chocolate

Seeing the Light: Holographic Chocolate
 - Blogs
Print


Every once in a while I see some technology that stops me cold and makes me mentally exclaim: “Wow!" This week—and it may take top prize for the year—is holographic chocolates that depend on nothing more than chocolate, molding technology and the properties of light.

Really, how cool is that?

My knowledge of the properties of light pretty much starts and ends with using refractometers to measure soluble solids and admiring the effects of crystals, prisms and raindrops. So instead of fumbling the physics, I’ll let Veronica Savu, CEO of Morphotonix, the Swiss company that invented the holographic chocolate technology describe it:
“The effect is light diffraction, just like you see on a CD in the sun," Savu explained. “It is due to the fact that the surface of the material (in this case chocolate) has a controlled roughness at the micrometer scale. This comes from molding the chocolate into molds with controlled roughness. This controlled roughness could be for example grooves between 1 to 10 micrometers wide. Although the grain size of chocolate is between 20 to 30 micrometers, it still molds inside these grooves pretty well, depending on the chocolate and processing. So we do not use printing, it is pure standard chocolate molding into molds which have very small features. What we do is actually making these features into the metallic mastermold form which the plastic molds are replicated… The effect is similar to the effect on the wings of a morpho butterfly, which is due not only to pigment, but to the shape of the wings at the microscale."

So I asked Savu: Why chocolate? Besides the Swiss connection and all? Not only is chocolate delicious, apparently it just happens to possess the right qualities, she said: “The processing (molding) does not involve anything new or different from the standard. It could be used on other foods, as long as the grain size lends itself to molding in such small grooves."

There you have it, the intersection of food science and physics—or what happens when engineers play with their food. And it’s a fine example of the complexity that is food science.

Then she posed a question to me—what other foods could work given those parameters? She suggested tofu, I thought perhaps cheese or a molded gelatin or some other sort of hydrocolloid. Other types of candy, maybe some sort of confectionery flake?  An edible film that might replace those annoying stickers on fresh product? (Remember patent lawyers; you heard it here first.) Frozen foods would probably work, but melt too quickly to be practical. I hear open innovation is quite the thing these days. So here’s a puzzle for all the food scientists that deal with the microstructure of foods: What foods might fit the particle size constraints, mold cleanly and maintain the proper shape?

Not that I’m geeking out or anything…but seriously, how cool is this?