Showing posts with label agri-food Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label agri-food Canada. Show all posts

Friday, 14 March 2014

CANADIAN FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY UPDATE

Food processing remains a strong industry despite plant closures
Mar 12, 2014 Romina Maurino, The Canadian Press

TORONTO – Despite a number of high-profile plant closures in recent months, the food processing industry in Canada is becoming more competitive and those efforts are likely to bear fruit in the form of jobs, according to a new study.

Western University’s Ivey Business School says its study found that the most commonly cited reason for closures was that a plant was no longer competitive and, in many cases, production was being consolidated at another location.
But when new plants open, they are often larger and incorporate new technology that drives down costs, it found.
Recent high-profile food plant closures in Ontario, such as the Kellogg operation in London and the threat of closure that loomed over the Heinz plant in Leamington before it was saved by a last-minute deal, raised concerns in a province that had watched its auto and steel industries decimated by the recession.
While auto manufacturing has improved, a string of closures that also included Smucker’s and Lance Canada Ltd, has led many to question the future of food processing in the province.
But the Western study, co-authored by David Sparling, said that between 2008 and 2014, the 105 closures in the province have been balanced by 105 openings and plant investments.
That means that while plant closures resulted in job losses, the industry overall did not experience a net decline in employment.
“The food industry typically has had lots of small plants and lots more retail,” he said.
“The new footprint for globally competitive manufacturing tends to be larger plants and probably located close to workforces as well as markets and transportation corridors.”
Hamilton, Brantford, London, Toronto and Windsor, Ont., are all large centres that have big workforces and the ability to service a larger company, he said.
“We’re probably going to lose more small plants in some small centres, (but) that said, the food industry also has a huge number of small companies and … a lot of them are starting up in rural centres, where people … want to extract some more value from farm product.”
Cities like Hamilton and Brantford, which were hit hard as manufacturing changed, are seeing new opportunities with a Ferrero Rocher plant in Brantford and a Canada Bread operation in Hamilton, said Sparling, who is the chair of Agri-food Innovation at Ivey.
When looking to set up new plants, he added, companies did consider whether there were people in the area who already understood manufacturing and were looking for work.
“The food industry doesn’t tend to pay quite as much as things like automotive and steel, so there’s a bit of an adjustment that way, but they are still good manufacturing jobs,” said Sparling.
Food processing, like other manufacturing in Canada, was hit hard by the recession, the high loonie, increased foreign competition and higher input costs.
But it has also been impacted by an increasingly competitive retail market for grocery stores, which “are operating at razor-thin margins and they’re just not doing as well as they have been in the past,” Sparling said.
“That means they’re really unreceptive to increase costs coming to them, so that puts all kinds of pressure on food manufacturers to figure out how can we get interesting products that consumers would care about to retailers without imposing any additional costs.”
The study, titled The Changing Face of Food Manufacturing in Canada: An Analysis of Plant Closings, Openings and Investments, found that there were 143 plant closures announced between 2006 and 2014, resulting in projected losses of almost 24,000 jobs.
The industry went through a particularly challenging period in 2007 and 2008, when 48 closures in the country outnumbered the 27 openings and plant investments. Ontario was the hardest-hit province, while Quebec was more successful in balancing openings and investments with closures.
But revenue continued to increase during that period and employment recovered more quickly than at other manufacturers.
Closures were also offset by investments from both foreign and domestic companies, with Canadian firms making slightly higher investments and the majority of activity coming from smaller firms.
“The overall picture is one of an industry that went through tough times in the mid 2000s but in recent years has been looking more positive in spite of continuing challenges,” the report said.
“It is also an industry that is more ready to compete than it was in 2006.”
To continue to grow the sector going forward, the report highlighted the need to create an attractive investment environment, reduce energy costs, to support and facilitate trade and to provide incentives for companies to choose to set up shop in Canada and upgrade technology.
Food companies also voiced concern about labour supply issues in the future, as they worried about meeting the growing need for skilled labour and said they could benefit from greater use of apprenticeships and training programs.

The food processing industry produces more than 70 per cent of the food Canadians buy and, with revenue of more than $88 billion in 2011, it’s the second-largest Canadian manufacturing industry and Canada’s largest manufacturing employer.

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

Why are we blocking free trade between provinces?


This piece is one of a series of high-profile Canadians commenting on the Canadian Chamber of Commerce's Top 10 reasons Canadian competitiveness is dropping.
In an era focused on international free trade, it seems incongruous that Canada has so many internal barriers that impede movement of goods, services and people between provinces. That’s a situation that has to change if the country is going to stay competitive in a global marketplace, says Perrin Beatty, a former Conservative cabinet minister who is now president of The Canadian Chamber of Commerce.


Why are interprovincial trade barriers a problem?
Businesses are operating today in an intensely competitive global economy. It is important for them to have a market at home in which they can build their scale. We are a comparatively small economy to begin with, and if we Balkanize our economy and turn it into 13 regional ones, then it is much more difficult for Canadian companies to get the scale that they need to be able to be globally competitive.
Also, from the perspective of Canadian consumers and customers of businesses, it limits choice and drives up costs.
What are some of the worst barriers?
Try driving a big truck across Canada and you will discover very quickly the layers of regulation you have to deal with as you move from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. All of these layers create barriers to doing business across the country.
We [also] have impediments that may make it difficult, at a time of high unemployment, for workers to move from one area to another where their skills may be in demand. They have to be relicensed to offer their skills in another jurisdiction.
You can see [barriers] in local preferences given in bidding on contracts for governments. There may be discrimination against bidders from out of a region or out of a province.
The most celebrated case recently was that of wine, where Parliament finally intervened to say, ‘Yes, we should allow interprovincial wine sales.’ [But] provincial wine monopolies are dragging their feet on this, and we still don’t have an open market. This clearly makes no sense.
This is all self-defeating. It drives up costs and it enshrines inefficiencies in the system. It builds costs into the economy. The government of Alberta estimated a few years ago that the costs [of interprovincial trade barriers] could be as much as $14-billion a year to the Canadian economy.
How damaging are the barriers that diminish labour mobility?
In instances where you have to be certified to offer a service in a particular jurisdiction, a Canadian who has a skill in one region of the country has difficulty in moving to another region, and taking up a job that may be open – particularly jobs that may be open for the short term. [That is damaging because] what we are seeing is not a shortage of bodies available to work, but a mismatch between the skills that are available and the demands of the work force. We need to make it easier for people to move within Canada and put their skills to work. That will bring down costs and also help reduce unemployment. If we can move people off employment insurance or off welfare and on to the job rolls and tax rolls, everybody benefits.
What role do agricultural marketing boards play in this issue?
[The main issue is the] quotas, which assign what production is allowed to be sold. Obviously, anything like that interferes in the market system. It says that some people will not be allowed to sell, based on residency.
How have provincial trade barriers changed over time?
One of the reasons for the creation of Canada was the abrogation of reciprocity with the United States. When we no longer had access to that U.S. market, the Canadian colonies came together and they struck an agreement that was designed in large part to ensure free trade within Canada. Section 121 of the constitution is quite clear in saying there should be no duties or impediments put in the way of trade within Canada. So the clear intention of the founders of the country was to have a single market in Canada.

Sunday, 28 April 2013

What is Food Sustainability?


Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada just released an interesting article on Sustainability.  Check this out. 

Sustainable Development

Sustainable development is about decision making that takes into account the economy, society and the environment in an integrated way. All Canadians have a role to play in advancing sustainable development, including all levels of government, business and industry, civil society, community groups and citizens.

In keeping with its mandate, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) has a long-standing commitment to the sustainability of the agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector. This commitment is reflected in its three Strategic Outcomes, which include "An environmentally sustainable agriculture, agri-food and agri-based products sector." The Department's commitment to the sustainability of the sector is also reflected in the Program Activities that support its Strategic Outcomes.

Federal Sustainable Development Strategy

The government's commitment to sustainable development is reflected in the Federal Sustainable Development Act (the Act), which received Royal Assent on June 26, 2008. The purpose of the Act is "to provide the legal framework for developing and implementing a Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS) that will make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament".
The FSDS, which was tabled on October 6, 2010, is also guided by the following principle stated in the Act:
"The Government of Canada accepts the basic principle that sustainable development is based on an ecologically efficient use of natural, social and economic resources and acknowledges the need to integrate environmental, economic and social factors in the making of decisions by government."
The FSDS, developed by Environment Canada in consultation with departments and agencies, brings together goals, targets and implementation strategies under the following four priority environmental themes:
  1. Addressing Climate Change and Air Quality;
  2. Maintaining Water Quality and Availability;
  3. Protecting Nature; and
  4. Shrinking the Environmental Footprint - Beginning with Government
The Government of Canada is looking for input from Canadians on the draft second cycle of the FSDS, covering the period 2013 to 2016. Canadians are encouraged to submit comments before June 14, 2013 on the advancement of federal sustainable development initiatives by visiting Environment Canada's website.

Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy

The Act requires each Minister presiding over a department to prepare a Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy. AAFC has updated its Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy which is tabled as part of its Report on Plans and Priorities. The DSDS describes AAFC's objectives and plans for sustainable development appropriate to its mandate. It articulates AAFC's vision and decision making process for sustainable development, and sets out the Department's contribution to the goals and targets of the FSDS, including Greening Government Operations, as well as the application of Strategic Environmental Assessments.

Greening Government Operations

Government-wide targets have been established under the leadership of Public Works and Government Services Canada, in consultation with departments, to achieve the goal of Greening Government Operations (GGO). As a large federal custodian of buildings, land, fleet and equipment, AAFC is committed to making progress against GGO targets, which are described in a supplementary table to Report on Plans and Priorities. For details on AAFC's commitments, please see the Greening Government Operations supplementary information table.

Strategic Environmental Assessment

AAFC also commits to applying Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA) to help ensure that environmental considerations are integrated with economic and social factors at an early stage of policy and program decision making and to address the government's environmental goals as laid out in the FSDS. For more information on AAFC's application of the SEA, please visit AAFC's website.

AAFC's Departmental Sustainable Development Strategies

Saturday, 27 April 2013

Principles of Sustainable Foods


Here is an excellent article on identifying key principles behind developing a sustainable food program.  Are you following these best practices?


Principles of Sustainable Foods

Food is central to our lives, even if we choose to perceive its role as marginal.  It’s  vital to our growth and ability to function. The way our foods are obtained have a great impact on the collective challenges we face individually and as a whole society. Defining what makes food sustainable is a complex task that must address not only how foods are procured, but also whether will be able to produce them at the changed conditions they we may face in the future, and whether they can sustain our human health as well as principles of cultures that support the food supply.
We have defined 17 Principles of Sustainable Foods that will guide our contributions towards the development of a sustainable food system. They may also help to better understand elements of food sustainability. These are fundamental to our educational effort since everything we want to develop and demonstrate must be grounded in these principles.
The list of principles demonstrates our wholistic approach of building our organization and our projects. It covers how food is grown or raised, climate and water considerations, energy use in food production and processing,food and health connections , food economy and the links between food and culture. Seeing these issues in any lesser context would not allow us to fully appreciate or address the challenge.

Principles of Sustainable Foods

  1. Food comes directly or indirectly (livestock) from a sustainable, healthy soil that gives and receives its nutrients in a cycle and over time grows its food-producing capacity rather than losing it
  2. Food production is in sync with the natural environment and supports the biodiversity on which food production directly or indirectly depends
  3. Food can be produced at local climate conditions and with the amount of water available in the area
  4. Production of food at all parts of the supply chain strives to maximize use of sun energy and minimize use of fossil fuels
  5. Food can be obtained from the wild if it is done without damaging the natural ecosystems
  6. Livestock is an indispensable part of a healthy sustainable farm environment and its production is mutually beneficial to animals and the larger ecosystems of which they are a part
  7. Food production supports the diversity of both plants and livestock and  also diversity within species (different breeds and varieties)
  8. Food is grown or raised and processed locally, avoiding the costs and environmental impact of transportation.  Geographically, the closer it’s production is to the point of consumption, the better
  9. Food is processed without industrial ingredients, complex industrial equipment and facilities that require excessive amounts of energy to build and operate
  10. Food requires minimum levels of processing; the less processed it is the better
  11. Processing enhances food’s nutritional qualities and/or preserves foods for off-season consumption
  12. Food is best if eaten in season; if it is preserved, this should be done with minimal damage to its nutritional qualities and by using renewable energy
  13. Food sustains human health; first, it must not be harmful, but even more importantly, it has to provide nutrition that will allow people to stay healthy over generations
  14. All groups involved in food production; farmers, processors, workers, business people, traders, etc. can sustain their livelihoods at the level comparable to other sectors of the society 
  15. Food is produced by a very diverse and large group of local farmers and food entrepreneurs; together they form a co-operating, resilient and sustainable web of food supply
  16. Food needs to be tasty, cherished and celebrated when eaten
  17. Food contributes to, builds and helps sustain cultures of which it is part
Strong commitment to these principles doesn't mean that ARSAN takes an idealistic approach of full and immediate adherence to them. We don’t expect that either from anyone else who may consider these principles as valid and fundamental. Building a new, sustainable way of life is a process. Making progress on the path guided by these principles is much more important than striving for instant perfection. Attempting to be strict about achieving ideals in the world that is far from perfect is unrealistic and can only lead to discouragement, burnout and abandonment. Progress on a chosen path guided by solid principles is what offers the best chance for success.
But accepting that we may not be perfect on the path towards a new, sustainable way of life doesn't mean selling out or looking for loopholes to escape the challenge. There should always be full awareness where we are missing the mark, why it may make sense to allow a concession and what can be done to make progress in the future. All tools available to people, including all modern tools such as machinery, technology and even chemicals may be used to help any progressive cause or undermine it. We believe that the problem doesn't lie with tools. Our strong commitment to ARSAN's purpose is what should give assurance that being practical rather than idealistic is the most effective approach to advance the cause

Thursday, 18 April 2013

Agri-Food Trade Service


Content Manager's Blog

This Web site was created 15 years ago as a source of market information and export support activities for Canadian companies. As the web evolves and our interaction with clients intensifies we've decided to take a more active approach in keeping you informed with what we've published recently and to give a sneak peak at what you can look forward to in the coming months in the hopes of giving you a reason to come back and get more involved with our projects.

Helping Canadian Exporters Achieve Export Success: A Quick Guide to the Agri-Food Trade Service Web Site

April 3, 2013

Whether you're a first time or experienced exporter, the Agri-Food Trade Service web site offers a variety of resources for Canadian exporters looking to do business abroad. Not sure where to start? Let us give you a quick rundown of our most popular resources and services!
Assess Your Export Potential
Shipping containers
Our Export Assistancesection offers resources on export plans, financing, market access, and federal and provincial programs and services.
Research the Market
Learn more about specific international and domestic markets for your products in ourMarket Information andNews and Analysissections. We produce country profiles, as well as in-depth retail, foodservice, and consumer trend reports and best of all, they're free! If you don't find what you're looking for, contact us atinfoservice@agr.gc.ca and we may be able to provide customized market intelligence to meet your export needs or refer you to the appropriate contact.
Network and Meet Buyers
Explore your target market and meet prospective buyers in person by participating in a trade show. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada exhibits at some of the world's largest agriculture and food shows. For example, many Canadian fish and seafood exporters are joining us in the Canada Pavilion at the European Seafood Exposition in Brussels this upcoming April!
Connect with Us
Ready to export? Our trade commissioners and officerslocated abroad and in regional offices across the country, can help qualified exporters connect with the right buyers and partners, or join a suitable trade mission overseas.
Stay Updated
Throughout the year, we share snapshots of the trade and export activities we engage in on this blog. For the latest updates on market intelligence, export news and upcoming trade shows, follow us on Twitter as well @ats_aafc.
What other resources are you looking for? Tell us in the comments below!