Wednesday 29 January 2014

CANADIAN MARKET TRENDS: Oceans of Opportunity

CANADIAN MARKET TRENDS: Oceans of Opportunity

 0December 6, 2013 at 10:52 am by Carol Neshevich

fishWith the Pacific Ocean to the west, the Atlantic to the east, the Arctic Ocean up north and the Great Lakes in between, Canada seems naturally suited to succeed in the seafood business. The industry is certainly important for the Canadian economy: Canada was the world’s fifth-largest fish and seafood exporter in 2011, with exports to more than 130 countries. And in 2012, Canada’s fish and seafood exports brought in $4.1 billion, an increase of $41 million over 2011.

But like any industry, the seafood business in Canada has its own unique challenges. These days, issues such as sustainability, consolidation and aquaculture, among others, are providing the Canadian seafood industry with a number of challenges — as well as enormous opportunities.

Environmental footprint
Sustainability is undoubtedly the number-1 issue in seafood today. “Sustainability is certainly high on everybody’s agenda,” says Henry Demone, president and CEO of Lunenberg, N.S.-based High Liner Foods Inc. “And I think it’s great that it’s high on everybody’s agenda.” As the world population grows, he explains, “seafood is a great way to feed people — if it’s sustainable. Sustainable wild seafood has lower carbon footprint, lower freshwater use, lower feed use …lower in pesticides, lower herbicides, lower antibiotics — if it’s sustainable, it really has a lower environmental footprint than any other protein. So I think it’s really important that the industry has gone in that direction.”

Sustainability has been a growing concern in the industry since the 1990s, but the movement has gained particularly strong momentum in the past two to three years. Interestingly, Demone says this hasn’t really been driven by consumer demand. “I’m not saying there aren’t any consumers out there looking for this, but generally it’s been a retail-driven phenomenon,” he says, noting that typically it’s been NGOs pressuring retailers, and then retailers pressuring the brands and suppliers to comply.

Linda Fox, director of Marketing, Frozen Business Unit for Markham, Ont.-based Sofina Foods Inc., agrees that it’s not largely a consumer-driven initiative. Sofina purchased Janes Family Foods in 2012, and as a producer of frozen packaged fish products the Janes brand has been using only fish that is certified by the MSC (Marine Stewardship Council — the international body working toward implementing sustainable fishing practices around the world) since 2011. But as Fox explains, “We did not implement this change in response to strong consumer demand.” Leger Marketing conducted an online survey of 1,500 Canadians in May 2011 for the Janes brand, and according to Fox, “the survey revealed that only one in 10 Canadians choose their seafood in grocery stores or restaurants based on seafood sustainability. Taste and price were ranked as having the highest influence on the type of seafood selected.” For Janes, however, sustainability has long been a deeply held goal for the brand, regardless of consumer concern for the issue. “We certainly feel it is important that corporations step up where they can,” says Fox.

There have undoubtedly been some financial costs associated with insisting on sustainable practices, but “it’s the cost of doing business these days,” says Sal Battaglia, vice-president of Marketing at Vaughan, Ont.-based wholesaler Seacore Seafood Inc. The sustainability movement has definitely changed the way Seacore operates in the last couple of years. “Before, we weren’t really looking if our resource product was sustainable or not, but now it’s actually one of the most important things,” says Battaglia. “Whenever we’re sourcing product, we’ll always try to see if there’s a sustainable option, and if there is, then we’ll source that product.” Adds Fox, “there is some expense associated with carrying the MSC logo, but it isn’t too onerous and it helps to fund additional awareness and education. The cost of not using certified sustainable seafood is larger in the long run.”

And the good news is that things are beginning to level off in terms of higher costs, as the seafood world has moved closer toward full sustainability. “It’s always particularly difficult during transitions, but I think the worst is over for that right now,” says Demone. “Let’s say, for example, that cod comes from four different countries, one of which is certified sustainable. Well, that country [with the certified cod] is going to charge more for their cod, given equal quality and other attributes. But once you get most of the cod fisheries certified, then it just becomes the going cod price. So I think the industry has gotten far enough along now that we’re paying less of a premium each year to meet that commitment. It was probably harder [financially] a year or two ago.”

Larger players
Another major trend affecting Canada’s seafood industry today is consolidation, as mergers and acquisitions tighten up a previously very fragmented industry. For High Liner in particular, says Demone, the company’s sales went from under $300 million six or seven years ago to somewhere between $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion today, and most of that growth has been due to mergers and acquisitions. “We’ve bought four of our competitors in the last six years,” Demone explains. “I think this is all positive for the industry, because the seafood industry, compared to other food categories, still remains highly fragmented. The fact that we’re one of the larger players at a run rate of just under $1.2 billion…well, we just wouldn’t be one of the larger players in most parts of the food business [with those numbers], to be honest with you, but in the seafood business we are, and that speaks to the fragmentation. So I think having larger players who can make the commitment to sustainability, who can develop the new products, who can provide proper marketing support for new product launches…I think that’s key.”

Indeed, Fox says the acquisition of Janes by Sofina has been positive for the company. “We now have access to a wide range of experienced professionals, the ability to pull together promotions among our own complementary brands, manufacturing facilities across Canada, and new protein products previously not in our repertoire, for example,” she maintains.

Derek Butler, executive director of the St. John’s, Nfld.-based Association of Seafood Producers, thinks all this consolidation is a good start, but feels this is just the tip of the iceberg. “There has been some consolidation in recent years, but more is needed. We are a very fragmented industry, very ‘small scale’ in terms of our competitors. That adds costs. Just to compare on one indicator, Alaska has a crab fishery with four major ports, while we have around 200. They have average landing size of over 100,000 lbs, and we are just over 7,000 lbs,” he explains. “On the processing side, plants are closing, particularly in shrimp, as the quota reduces, or [they] were closed by external factors, and then they opted not to re-open. We need more consolidation, and more economies of scale, to get more work out of the fisheries and higher incomes for all participants.”

Farmed fish
Aquaculture is another high-profile — and often controversial — issue in the seafood industry these days. Opponents of aquaculture criticize the practice for the potential waste, water pollution and spread of disease that can be associated with fish farming. That said, most of the industry players Food in Canada spoke with article agree that aquaculture has a vital role to play, as long as it’s done with best practices in mind. “I think everyone recognizes that aquaculture is an important source of fish protein all over the world, just like we get most other animal protein from farms,” says Butler.

Adds Demone: “I do think aquaculture has a big role to play in helping to feed a hungry planet. It is controversial in certain quarters…but let me also say when you compare aquaculture to land-based protein production, whether it’s the carbon footprint or the feed conversion ratio, aquaculture performs very well.” While Demone doesn’t say it’s perfect, he admits, “just like in the wild fishery, pressure to operate sustainably will bring good change, and I think that will happen in aquaculture as well….Some of the fishing companies may see it as competition, but I think generally, most of the market-facing companies like High Liner would say that aquaculture’s going to supply the growth, so we’ve got to get comfortable with it and we’ve got to do it right.”

There have been a few new farmed species making waves in recent years. “Every once in a while, a new species makes it into the mainstream,” says Demone, “and the two that have done that in the past 10 years in Canada have been tilapia and pangasius, which are both farmed fish, but farmed fish that have a low environmental impact because they’re mainly herbivorous.” Since both of these tend to be a little lower in cost — particularly pangasius — these new introductions have filled a need in Canada’s lower-priced white fish market, explains Demone.

Although the Janes brand currently doesn’t use farmed fish, the company isn’t ruling it out. “When we committed to having all of our products MSC-certified, we made a commitment we intend to keep,” says Fox. “However, it is also clear to us that there are types of farmed fish that some consumers enjoy. Tilapia, which is only farmed, and salmon, of which a significant percentage is farmed, both come to mind.” So while Janes currently sells only MSC-certified, wild-caught whole fillet products, she says, “we recognize there may come a day when we need to take a look at other certification programs like ASC (the Aquaculture Stewardship Council). The number of farmed fish that exist is large and growing, while some wild fish populations are declining. These facts, together with the exponential growth in the number of people on earth, makes it necessary for us to be on the lookout for good, sustainable, healthy ways to source protein. That doesn’t mean walking away from our MSC commitment; it does mean that we may expand our portfolio of options.”

Meanwhile, in the arena of processed and value-added seafood products, the industry continues to make headway with interesting new innovations. “Retailers are looking for new ways to market seafood, while consumers are looking for convenient and user-friendly ways to prepare seafood,” says Jeff Duffin, vice-president of Global Marketing for Bedford, N.S.-based Clearwater Seafoods LP. “For example, Clearwater has recently entered this retail space with new products like Scallops & Sauce and Bacon Wrapped Sea Scallops…By offering great-tasting and convenient options, we’re helping make seafood a part of consumers’ everyday lives.” Fox adds that smaller package sizes of plain frozen fillets seem to be gaining in popularity – “likely the boomer effect of smaller households,” she explains. Fish tacos are also a popular trend that value-added producers would do well to consider, says Fox. “Janes recently launched Fish Bites, which is a small battered piece of whole fillet that works well in a taco or on its own as a finger food for dipping – very family friendly.”
      Check out my new e-book entitled: Social Media Marketing in Agri-foods - Endless Profit and Painless Gain




The book is available on Amazon and Kindle for $4.99 USD. Visit amazon/Kindle to order now:
http://www.amazon.ca/Social-Media-Marketing-Agri-Foods-ebook/dp/B00C42OB3E/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1364756966&sr=1-1

Thanks for taking the time

Tuesday 28 January 2014

MARKET TRENDS: 10 quirky food trends for 2014

MARKET TRENDS: 10 quirky food trends for 2014


food trends 2014

food trends 2014


RITA DEMONTIS, NATIONAL FOOD EDITOR, QMI AGENCY


, Last Updated: 4:22 PM ET

Cue the cauliflower — it's this year's kale. And eggs are giving beef a run for the money in food trends we'll be celebrating in 2014.
According to Canadian Restaurant News, the National Restaurant Association, (who reached out to the nation's professional foodies) this year's food trends range from the usual standards — locally sourced everything — to the unique and unusual, like hybrid desserts (cronuts live!), and snout to tail eating.
Gluten-free continues to dominate the menus and the quinoa love affair is as hot as ever (although I for one was hoping all the hype for this weed would die down a tad).
And gin will be 2014’s liquor of choice.
There's so much in store this year, with supermarket aisles crammed with new and innovative food types, to restaurants turning menus inside out with daring new dishes. New York-based JWT, one of the world's best-known marketing communications brand, recently released its forecast of 100 things to watch for in 2014, and the list is delicious food for thought: Yogurt will be going the savoury route, and "silent meals" will be offered by restaurants (Eat in Brooklyn, NYC is one) to help diners "eat more mindfully" and focus more on the taste of the food rather than the noise and distraction.
Also, "stealth health" is coming to an eatery near you — where restaurant chains work to improve the quality and nutrition of their offerings (like cutting back on sodium and preservatives) — but hoping diners don't notice.
JWT reports one of the 10 Trends in the produce department is "ugly" produce — proudly imperfect, lumpy goods like heirloom tomatoes, or gnarled carrots normally seen at farmers' markets are gaining more appeal than the prettier produce we're used to. There's even a private-label line of "nonconformist" produce dubbed "Wunderlinge" - a riff on the words anomaly and miracle that are selling like crazy in Austria!

We're also going to see cocktails on tap (much like we've seen wine on tap) and craft mocktails, which incorporate syrup infusions, fresh juices and homemade sodas for non-drinkers who have been stuck with the same old same old.
And look out for "deconstructed dinner kits" being delivered to your home — kits that provide all the ingredients, in just the right amounts, to make gourmet meals at home.
One trend worth eating up is "edible packaging" — JWT reports marketers are harnessing new technologies to create edible wrappers. The Bob’s burger chain in Brazil now serves its burgers in packaging you can eat. Harvard bioengineer David Edwards is behind WikiPearl, whose edible packaging can enclose any food or beverage, “like a grape skin,” he says.
According to Canadian Restaurant News, Peruvian cuisine looks to make waves along with "root-to-stalk" recipes to reduce food waste.
One of the biggest areas of change may be coming to a wedding reception near you — smaller, lighter menus are becoming common requests from the bride and groom, along with "raw" menus that include steak tartar and beef carpaccio, notes Toronto-based event specialist Tanya D'Adderio of Montcassino Hotel & Event venue. "We've also seen an increase in curiosity for sweet ingredients combined with savoury items," says D'Adderio. "One dish is a baked fish with a silky reduction of licorice — a truly memorable dish!"
      Check out my new e-book entitled: Social Media Marketing in Agri-foods - Endless Profit and Painless Gain




The book is available on Amazon and Kindle for $4.99 USD. Visit amazon/Kindle to order now:
http://www.amazon.ca/Social-Media-Marketing-Agri-Foods-ebook/dp/B00C42OB3E/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1364756966&sr=1-1

Thanks for taking the time

Monday 27 January 2014

HEALTH ALERT: UK: 90% of food displayed to children at checkouts unhealthy, study finds

UK: 90% of food displayed to children at checkouts unhealthy, study finds

Products packed with fat, salt and sugar displayed at child's eye level at Asda, Sainsbury's and Tesco convenience stores
  • , health editor Theguardian.com, 
Asda checkout
Asda checkout lanes. The researchers visited smaller stores of Asda, Sainsbury’s and Tesco in Sheffield. Photograph: David Levene for the Guardian
Convenience stores run by big supermarket chains involved in the government's responsibility deal on nutrition are exposing children to substantial displays of unhealthy sweets and snack food at the checkout, according to a study.
Researchers at Sheffield University visited the smaller stores of Asda, Sainsbury's and Tesco in the city and discovered what harassed parents often complain of – that the queue for the checkout often passes shelves of chocolate bars, drinks and sweet snacks at children's eye level.
In a first, they analysed the food items that were at just the right height for children – about one metre from the ground – and worked out their nutritional value. The team from the university's school of health and related research found that 90% of the products children saw as their parents queued to pay were unhealthy, according to the Food Standards Agency's definition. They were packed with saturated fat, salt and sugar. The healthiest item on display was sugar-free chewing gum.
The study featured just 13 stores in Sheffield, but Dr Jason Horsley, who led it, said there was no reason to believe they were unusual. "I can't say for sure that the rest of the country is not unlike Sheffield and does not have a completely different eating pattern, but I travel around and haven't noticed any obvious differences elsewhere."
The three supermarket chains are all members of the government's public health responsibility deal, which was launched in 2011 and had been running for a year before the data for the study was collected. The deal involves food manufacturers, restaurants and supermarkets signing pledges to reduce the amount of saturated fat, salt and calories in food and drinks.
In March 2011 all three supermarket chains pledged to "support and enable our customers to eat and drink fewer calories through actions such as product/menu reformulation, reviewing portion sizes, education and information, and actions to shift the marketing mix towards lower-calorie options".
The deal is the flagship of the coalition government's anti-obesitystrategy, driven by concerns particularly about the increasing weight of children, a third of whom in the UK are now overweight or obese. Overweight children are more likely to become obese adults and obesity is linked to a wide range of diseases including diabetes, heart problems and cancer.
But it is hard for parents to take a stand against the pester power of children, which has long been recognised by those involved in food marketing. "Children are a significant market for retailers of processed foodstuffs, and budgets dedicated to advertising to children have grown exponentially in the last three decades. Youngsters are often naive to sophisticated marketing techniques and they influence parents' purchases through pester power," said Horsley.
The inner-city stores were visited by medical students, who received permission from the managers to survey the items on display at child's eye height at the checkout. One store had a completely different display at the checkout from all the others: there were no sweets or junk food snacks, just dried fruit and nuts.
"The students who collected the data asked the store manager why," said Horsley. "He said because he'd seen something about a potential change in company policy or something that might be going to happen. He'd discussed it with his mum, who told him he should do it."
Some of the big chains have changed their checkout displays at larger supermarkets in response to pressure, but not at the smaller convenience stores. Sainsbury's pointed out that the sweets had long gone from the checkout lanes of their big stores, but suggested customers did not want the same thing in the smaller shops.
"We were one of the first supermarkets to stop selling confectionery at main checkouts over five years ago to help customers shopping with their families," said a spokesperson. "We also know that people shop differently in convenience stores to supermarkets and expect to find confectionery near the tills in those stores, but we always stock a good selection of fruit, nuts and other healthier alternatives alongside."
The Children's Food Campaign has been enlisting parents to pressure supermarkets to remove junk food from the checkout by handing in red cards stating "Your store has failed the checkout test", and green ones if the sweets and unhealthy snacks have been removed.
Malcolm Clark, of the campaign, said the Sheffield study was in line with international research on junk food at the tills. "Convenience stores are the next big challenge," he said.
Clark pointed out that Lidl banned sweets from the checkouts at all its 600 stores this month, replacing them with dried and fresh fruit, oatcakes and juices. Its research showed that seven out of 10 customers would choose lanes without sweets.
A Tesco spokesperson said: "Tesco was the first to take sweets off checkouts in our larger stores more than a decade ago. We are now looking at how to give customers a more balanced range of choices, including healthier products, at checkouts in our smaller convenience stores."
Asda said: "We're at a loss to understand why this narrow research is being taken seriously. Asda doesn't operate the small high street shops referred to in the study and nor does the report take into consideration the mix of food with non food at checkouts.
"We believe in offering customer's choice and encouraging healthy, balanced lifestyles. We therefore offer customers a range of different products at our checkouts including batteries, magazines as well as toiletries and some treats."
      Check out my new e-book entitled: Social Media Marketing in Agri-foods - Endless Profit and Painless Gain




The book is available on Amazon and Kindle for $4.99 USD. Visit amazon/Kindle to order now:
http://www.amazon.ca/Social-Media-Marketing-Agri-Foods-ebook/dp/B00C42OB3E/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1364756966&sr=1-1

Thanks for taking the time

Sunday 26 January 2014

HEALTH ALERT: Sodium Intake

CDC PUBLISHES REPORT TO HELP RESTAURANTS REDUCE SODIUM

The report, “From Menu to Mouth: Opportunities for Sodium Reduction in Restaurants," outlines several ways health departments and restaurants have worked together to offer lower-sodium choices:
  • Health department dietitians help restaurants analyze the sodium content of their foods and recommend lower-sodium ingredients.
  • Restaurants clearly post nutrition information, including sodium content, at the order counter and on menus or offer lower-sodium items at lower cost.
  • Health departments and restaurants explain to food service staff why lower sodium foods are healthier and how to prepare them.
The report also features examples of sodium reduction successes. In Philadelphia, the health department worked with 206 restaurants to create the “Philadelphia Healthy Chinese Take-out Initiative." After nine months, analyses of two popular dishes offered by 20 of the restaurants showed sodium was reduced by 20%.

“The bottom line is that it’s both possible and life-saving to reduce sodium, and this can be done by reducing, replacing and reformulating," said CDC director Tom Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. “When restaurants rethink how they prepare food and the ingredients they choose to use, healthier options become routine for customers."

Americans eat out at fast food or dine-in restaurants four or five times a week; on average, foods from fast food restaurants contain 1,848 mg of sodium per 1,000 calories and foods from dine-in restaurants contain 2,090 mg of sodium per 1,000 calories.

The U. S. Dietary Guidelines recommend the general population limit sodium to less than 2,300 mg a day. However, a recent CDC report shows the majority of the U.S. population consumes excess sodium. Exceeding recommended amounts can cause high blood pressure, one of the leading causes of heart disease and stroke.

Sources:

      Check out my new e-book entitled: 
      Social Media Marketing in Agri-foods - Endless Profit and Painless Gain




The book is available on Amazon and Kindle for $4.99 USD. Visit amazon/Kindle to order now:
http://www.amazon.ca/Social-Media-Marketing-Agri-Foods-ebook/dp/B00C42OB3E/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1364756966&sr=1-1

Thanks for taking the time

Thursday 23 January 2014

FOOD SUSTAINABILITY: Part 5 - Agroecological innovations for sustainable intensification


Food Sustainability: 
Box 3: Agroecological innovations for sustainable intensification
Agroforestry:
Agroforestry incorporates trees or shrubs into cropping systems, offering a range of benefits such as replenishing soil fertility and providing food, fodder, timber and fuelwood — and so helping produce greater value than single crops. [19] The system's potential is most powerfully demonstrated in the Sahel, where agroforestry supported by soil and water conservation has 're-greened' the desert. In Niger, for example, five million hectares have been rehabilitated, benefitting some 2.5 million people. [20]

Agroforestry can also increase yields substantially. In Burkina Faso, for example, planting trees and shrubs on farms across 200,000–300,000 hectares of farmland has boosted food production by some 80,000 tonnes a year. In Cameroon, maize yields have increased by 70 per cent on average, where leguminous trees and shrubs were planted on croplands. [21] Across Africa, using 'fertiliser tree' systems has increase the yields of food crops such as maize while reducing the use of expensive inorganic fertiliser. [22]


Integrated Pest Management (IPM): 
IPM combines targeted use of agrochemicals with growing practices and biological techniques to control pests. Assessments of IPM show that it is possible to improve crop yields while reducing overall pesticide use. An assessment of 62 IPM initiatives in 26 countries revealed a 35 per cent increase in yields of various crops, alongside a 72 per cent decrease in pesticide use. [23] An innovative new IPM system, called 'push-pull technology' has been developed by Kenyan scientists in collaboration with UK researchers to control pests (notably stem-borers and Strigaweed). It attracts pests to nearby plants (pull) while driving them away from the field using a repellent crop grown among the farmers' main crop (push). This system is now widely deployed across Africa — an estimated 30,000 smallholders in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania use it. In a recent assessment of push-pull IPM, researchers report 3–4-fold increases in maize, 2-fold increases in sorghum, improved soil health and increased farm biodiversity. [24]

Conservation agriculture (CA) and the System of Rice Intensification (SRI):
CA consists of three interlinked principles: minimal soil tilling, maintaining permanent organic soil cover, and cultivating diverse crop species. CA was first developed in Latin America, and is now practiced on around 106 million hectares of arable and permanent crops. SRI, based on principles such as minimal use of water and transplanting of young seedlings, is widely used across Asia, Latin America and Africa, and has resulted in substantial yield increases while improving water-use efficiency. SRI benefits include 20-100 per cent or more increased yields, up to 90 per cent reduction in required seed, and up to 50 per cent water savings. [25] Both of these management systems may contradict conventional advice from agricultural research institutes and the agriculture service, and often clash with what farmers think works best. [26] For example, cultivating SRI rice involves an unconventional irrigation schedule where fields are periodically drained rather than perpetually saturated. However, applying them while involving farmers as co-creators at every stage can help both farmers and research and extension agents to engage in creative and transformative change, rethinking established practices and exploring new ideas. [26]  
Participation is key
It is clear that innovation by itself is not enough to ensure increased food production, resource conservation or social-ecological well-being. Farmers, rural workers, local groups and community leaders need to participate in innovation, rather than being treated as passive recipients of new technologies. Participatory models work — a recent analysis of 40 cases of sustainable intensification of agriculture in Africa shows the ways in which farmers, public and private-sector partners have developed, adapted and disseminated agroecological systems that have increased yields while delivering environmental and social benefits. [15] All the cases highlight the importance of farmer engagement, peer-to-peer learning, and of developing and using local institutions.


Professor Tim Benton on building links between researchers in the global north and south
There is no single technical or managerial fix to the interlinked problems of global hunger, poverty and environmental degradation. The role of S&T will be one of developing a diverse menu of options which farmers can use, share and tailor, providing a range of social, economic and ecological benefits over and above increased productivity.  
Zareen Pervez Bharucha is post-doctoral research officer for the Ecocultures consortium at the School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, United Kingdom. She is also editorial assistant for the International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. She can be reached at zpbhar@essex.ac.uk

The author thanks professor Jules Pretty for comments on an earlier version of this article.
Definitions
Agrifood systemsThe network of agricultural and food systems. Itincludes the distribution and governance ofresources such as land, seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and credit, and the mechanisms by which food products are processed, sold and transported. 
AgroecologyThe science and practice of managing agricultural ecosystems as a whole, rather than focusing solely on their individual elements such as plants and soil.
AgronomyThe science of plant-based agriculture. It includestopics such as plant genetics, plant physiology and soil science.
BiotechnologyThe science and practice of using living cells or organisms to produce new and useful products such as foods, fuels or medicines.
Bt cottonOne of the best known and most widely used forms of transgenic crop (see below)This varietyof cotton has been developed using genetic material from the bacterium Bacillusthuringiensisallowing the plant to produce an insecticide that harms certain cotton pests.
Carbon sequestrationThe conversion and storage of atmospheric carbon into non-atmospheric 'sinks' such as biological matter — plants and animals take in and store, or sequester, carbon as they grow. Sequestration of carbon in biological matter is also called biosequestration
DrylandsRegions of the world where lack of water is the chief constraint on plant growth. 
Inorganic orsynthetic inputsFarming resources that are produced by inanimate processes, for example by industrial methods, as opposed to animate or natural processes such as decay and decomposition. Such resources, which include chemical fertilisers and pesticides, are used to raise yields by increasing soil nutrients and controlling pests. 
Input-intensive modelAgricultural production that uses large amounts of inputs such as seeds, energy, fertilisers and pesticides to boost crop yields. 
Integrated nutrient management (INM)An approach to sustainably ensuring optimal nutrition for plant growth by providing a balanced supply of synthetic and naturally produced fertiliser, and recycling nutrients where possible. 
LeguminousTypes of plant that can convert atmospheric nitrogen into a form that they and other plants can absorb through their roots and use for growth. This process, called nitrogen-fixing,occurs in special nodules on the plants' roots. These contain bacteria that can convert gaseous nitrogen in air pockets between soil particles into ammonia, which plants then use to produce proteins and grow. This ability effectively meansthat leguminous species produce nitrogen'fertiliser' for the field in which they are grown.
MalnutritionThe condition of having inadequate or improper nutrition over time. Malnutrition is a broad term that can encompass undernourishment (seebelow)overnutrition, which is the excessive consumption of caloriesand micronutrient malnutrition, which is the inadequate consumption of nutrients such as vitamins and minerals that are required in small amounts.
Molecular geneticsThe study of genes at a molecular level to understand how they work and how to manipulate them to produce desirable characteristics in living organisms.
Participatory orinclusive innovationsInnovations developed through mechanisms that give all stakeholders, especially end users, a say during their development. Participatory innovations in agriculture involve farmers in a project's design, development and dissemination stages, in the hope that their involvement will result in innovations that are targeted at farmers'real needs and are widely adopted. 
Rainfed farmingCrop cultivation that primarily depends on precipitation rather than irrigation. 
Seed systemsA network of factors that influence the quality, diversity and availability of seeds in a given region. These factors are diverse and could include the availability of credit so that farmers can buy seeds, and the quality of roads, which affects how seeds can be transported.
StaplesCrops that dominate the diet of a particular population in terms of quantity and contribution to total dietary energy. Globally, most dietary energy is now provided by just three grain crops: rice, wheat and maize. 
Transgenic cropsCrops that have been engineered to contain genes from different species so they express desirabletraits. Transgenic crops may contain genes from completely unrelated organisms that have been inserted by genetic manipulation in a laboratory —Bt cotton (see above), for example, contains genes from a species of bacteria. This contrasts withcrops produced by hybridisationthe process of combining different varieties. Hybrid crops are produced by sexual reproduction between two closely related species or varieties.
UndernourishmentThe inadequate intake of protein and energy in the diet, resulting in poor health including reduced mental and physical capacity and lowered resistance to disease. Often used synonymously with 'hunger'.

References

[1] FAO. The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources For Food and Agriculture: managing systems at risk. (FAO, Rome and Earthscan, London.  2011)
[2] von Grebmer, K et al. Global Hunger Index: the challenge of hunger. Ensuring sustainable food security under land, water and energy stress.(IFPRI, Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe 2012)
[3] Chaudhury, S. How to feed a billion. And why it pays.  (Tehelka, 2013)
[4] UNEP Global Drylands: A United Nations system-wide response. (UNEP EMG Secretariat, Geneva 2011)
[5] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing – Desertification Synthesis (World Resources Institute, Washington D.C. 2005)
[6] FAO Global NPP Loss in the Degrading Areas (1981-2003). (FAO GeoNetwork 2008)
[7] Smit A.L. et al. Phosphorus in agriculture: global resources,  trends and developments. (Plant Research International B.V., Wageningen, 2009)
[8] Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0123 (2010)
[9] Agarwal A. and Narain S. Dying Wisdom: The Rise, Fall and Potential of India’s Traditional Water Harvesting Systems (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, India 1997)
[10] Pingali P. and Raney T. From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution: How will the Poor Fare? (ESA, Working Paper No. 05-09. November 2005)
[11] Thompson J., et al. Agri-Food System Dynamics: pathways to sustainability in an era of uncertainty. (STEPS Centre, Working Paper 4, Brighton, UK. 2011)
[12] Pingali P.L. Green Revolution: Impacts, limits and the path ahead.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 109: 12302 (2012).
[13] Agron Sustain Dev doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0138-9 (2013)
[14] Glover D. Undying Promise: Agricultural Biotechnology’s Pro-poor Narrative, Ten Years on. (Working Paper 15, STEPS Centre, Brighton UK 2009)
[15]  Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0583 (2011)
[16] Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0545. (2011)
[17] Environ Sci Tech doi: 10.1021/es051670d (2006)
[18] IAASTD. Agriculture at a Crossroads. (Island Press: Washington D.C. 2009)
[19] Food Security  doi: 10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7 (2010)
[20] UNEP. Africa: Atlas of our Changing Environment (UNEP 2008)
[21] Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0553 (2011)
[22] Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0554 (2011)
[23] Pretty J. and Waibel H. Paying the price: the full cost of pesticides. In Pretty J. The Pesticide Detox: Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.Earthscan: London 2005.
[24]  Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0558  (2011) 
[25] System of Rice Intensification. SRI Concepts and Methods Applied to Other Crops.  (SRI-Rice Online, 2012)
[26]  Int J Agr Sustain doi: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0549 (2011)    
[27] Environ Sci Tech doi: 10.1021/es062097g (2007)


          Check out my new e-book entitled: "Social Media Marketing in Agri-Foods: Endless Profit and Painless Gain"




The book is available on Amazon and Kindle for $4.99 USD. Visit amazon/Kindle to order now:
http://www.amazon.ca/Social-Media-Marketing-Agri-Foods-ebook/dp/B00C42OB3E/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1364756966&sr=1-1

Thanks for taking the time