Saturday, 6 September 2014

GLOBAL TRADE: Venezuela's international reserves in a single account


Venezuela's international reserves in a single account

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro explained that funds in foreign currency belonging to the State's strategic reserve would be pooled in a single account at the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV)

Resources of the National Development Fund (Fonden), the Chinese Fund and other ancillary funds will be included in this new BCV account (File photo)
EL UNIVERSAL
Wednesday September 03, 2014  11:11 AM
Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro announced on Tuesday that a single account would be opened at the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV) in order to strengthen the management of international reserves and the country's public accounts.

Resources of the National Development Fund (Fonden), the Chinese Fund and other ancillary funds and funding mechanisms will be included in this new BCV account to strengthen strategic reserves, state-run news agency AVN underscored.

Maduro highlighted that depositing funds into a single account of international reserves in the BCV would be positive for the perception of Venezuela's capacity to meet its international commitments.

Translated by Andreína Trujillo

Thursday, 4 September 2014

VENEZUELA MARKET UPDATE: Maduro Announces 'Five Big Revolutions' in Venezuela, Overhauls Cabinet

In declarations to the country on Tuesday night, Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro announced what he described as "five revolutions", as part of a need to "improve our service to the people."
Maduro said the revolutions would be a "a new way of functioning" for the government, and emphasized the need for a more "efficient" government. 
The following five revolutions, he said, "should be united, and should define the government policies, giving power to the people, it will be the people who push government policy."
The first revolution that Maduro outlined is the economic revolution, promoting production, "in order to guarantee stability".
"All the efforts of the government should be concentrated on this, to make this revolution successful," he said.
The second revolution is the knowledge revolution, involve science, technology, and culture. "I call on all of Venezuela, on the youth, students, teachers, to be part of this revolution, to be part of the country´s social development, its spiritual development, forming a new ethics for a new society," Maduro said.
The missions are the third revolution.  Maduro emphasized their importance in "building socialism, creating the new society, where social rights and life are guaranteed."
The fourth revolution involves state policies and "creating a new state, one that´s really democratic, one that´s about justice, and  rights." It aims to transform all governmental structures, and end with what "remains of the bourgoise state." Maduro emphasized the importance of the fight against corruption.
In this fourth revolution he also announced a range of new ministers and structures.  Maduro announced a timeline for social movements to elect "popular presidencial councils", including for communes, women, youth, culture, and workers. Elections will be held during September and October. 
In terms of the new ministries, they will be restructured, with some combined, and many falling under "vice-presidencies". The vice-presidency of economy and finances, for example, will group together six ministries. Of these, the minister for petroleum will no longer be Rafael Ramirez. Ramirez will now be the foreign minister. Isabel Delgado is the new minister for trade, Jose Cabello for industry, Giuseppe Yoffreda for transport, and Jose Berreteran for agriculture. Andres Izarra will remain as minister for tourism. There will also be a vice-presidency of security and food sovereignty. The ministries of higher education and the ministry of science and technology will be combined, and headed up by Ricardo Menendez.
Maduro said the fifth revolution was one of "territorial socialism". He explained that it was about consolidating the communal model, and creating a "new eco socialist model". 
"It´s not about environmentalism, its about ecosocialism, environmentalism isn´t enough,"  Maduro stated.
***
The following is a list of the new cabinet:
Note: The Bolivarian government refers to each of its ministries as bodies of people’s power, e.g. Ministry of People’s Power for Finance and Economy. In the interest of a more concise list, venezuelanalysis.com has removed this title from each position, with no intention of undermining its significance.

Executive Vicepresident: Jorge Arreaza

Economic Vicepresident: Marcos Torres

President of PDVSA: Eulogio Delpino

Minister of Finance and Economy: Marcos Torres

Minister of Petroleum and Mining: Asdrúbal Chávez

Minister of Commerce: Isabel Delgado

Minister of Industries: José David Cabello

Minister of Tourism: Andrés Izarra

Minister of Sea and Air Transport: Giuseppe Jofreda

Vicepresident of Security and Food Sovereignty: Yván Gil

President of Agricultural Bank: Yván Gil

Minister of Land and Agriculture: José Luis Berroterán

Minister of Food: Iván José Bello

Superintendent of Fair Prices: Andrés Eloy Méndez

Vicepresident of Planning and Knowledge: Ricardo Menéndez

Minister of Higher Education, Science and Technology: Manuel Fernández

Minister of Culture: Reinaldo Iturriza

Minister of Eduation: Héctor Rodríguez

Minister of Youth and Sports: Antonio Álvarez

Vice-minister of Youth and Sports: Víoctor Clark

Minister of Indigenous Peoples: Aloha Núñez

Minister of Women: Andreina Tarazona

Minister of Penitentiary Affairs: Iris Varela

Minister of Health: Nancy Pérez

Minister of Communication: Delcy Rodríguez

Minister of Foreign Affairs: Rafael Ramírez

Vicepresident of Political Sovereignty: Rafael Ramírez

Minister of Interior Affairs, Justice, and Peace: Miguel Rodríguez Torres

Minister of Defense: Carmen Meléndez

Vicepresident of Development of Territorial Socialism: Elías Jaua

Minister of Communes and Social Movements: Elías Jaua

Minister of Housing, Habitat and Eco-socialism: Ricardo Molina

Vice-minister of Housing, Habitat and Eco-socialism: Miguel Leonatrdo Rodríguez

Minister of Ground Transport and Public Work Projects: Haiman el Troudi

Ultimate Authority of Paperwork and Permits: Dante Rivas

Minister of Electricity: Jesse Chacó
n

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

HEALTH & WELLNESS: Atkins? Ornish? The Biggest Loser? The branded diet industry is huge, but which one is best?


Atkins? Ornish? The Biggest Loser? The branded diet industry is huge, but which one is best?

A year-long Canadian study of more than 7,200 people on branded diets found little difference in results.
FotoliaA year-long Canadian study of more than 7,200 people on branded diets found little difference in results.
  •  
Atkins? Ornish? The Biggest Loser? Branded diets are a multi-billion-dollar industry, with each claiming to be superior to others. But an analysis of nearly 50 trials involving more than 7,200 overweight and obese adults led by Canadian researchers shows the weight-loss differences between trademarked diets are minimal. Sharon Kirkey of Postmedia News offers six things to know about the study, published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association:
How many of us diet?
“At any given time, 100 million Americans are on some type of diet,” said lead author Dr. Bradley Johnston, an assistant professor of clinical epidemiology at the Michael G. De Groote School of Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., and a clinical epidemiologist and scientist at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children. Many people are confused about the latest diet craze or “flavour of the day” that changes monthly, if not daily, he said. Given their popularity, “there has been a real lack of research (into competing diets) to examine their relative benefits,” said co-author Dr. Geoff Ball, an associate professor in the faculty of medicine and dentistry at the University of Alberta.
Which diet won at six months?
The team pooled data from 48 studies involving 7,286 individuals; the median age was 46, the median weight 94 kilograms. The studies included 11 branded diets: Atkins, Weight Watchers, Zone, Jenny Craig, LEARN, Nutrisystem, Ornish, Volumetrics, Rosemary Conley, Slimming World and South Beach. At six months out, people on low-carb diets lost the most (a median difference in weight loss of 8.73 kilograms) followed by those on low-fat diets (7.99 kilograms), compared with no diet. Intuitively a low-carb diet may have an edge because of the higher intake of protein, which produces a stronger “I’m full” effect than fats and carbohydrates, wrote the researchers.

Which diet won at 12 months?

During months seven through 12, the difference between the two diets was virtually lost (7.25 kilograms for low-carb versus 7.27 kilograms for low-fat.) The weight-loss differences between individual diets also were minimal. For example the Atkins diet resulted in an estimated weight loss of 1.7 kilograms more than the Zone diet at the six-month follow-up. Overall, the Ornish, Rosemary Conley, Jenny Craig and Atkins diets were associated with the largest weight loss at 12 months. Even then, “there was nothing that stood out in terms of huge differences” between diets, Dr. Johnston said.
Any complications?
Only five trials — all evaluating the Atkins diet — reported side effects; most were mild to moderate (such as constipation, headache and halitosis, or bad breath) and went away on their own. But, in an accompanying editorial, Linda Van Horn of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago raised concerns about the possible long-term effects of high-protein diets on kidney function and calcium loss after months or years on the diet.
Misery loves company — and exercise
People lost more on programs that included individual or group support or counselling (an extra three kilograms at six months). Those who exercised lost 0.64 kilograms more, on average, after six months, and three kilograms, on average, at the 12-month follow-up.
The bottom line?
People shouldn’t select a diet based on what they see on television, but rather what they feel they can stick with, Dr. Johnston said. Ultimately, the goal should be making long-term lifestyle changes so that any lost weight isn’t regained, he said. The paper “basically tells us that if you want to lose weight, you’ve got to reduce calories and keep them reduced,” said Dr. Yoni Freedhoff, medical director of the Bariatric Medical Institute in Ottawa, who wasn’t involved in the study. Despite the hype and hyperbolic news releases touting one diet over another, “So long as the diet helps (people) to reduce their calories and the person likes it enough to sustain it, they’re probably good to go.”

Finding the world’s best diet: What global gastronomy can teach us about how to eat


Finding the world’s best diet: What global gastronomy can teach us about how to eat

Kimchi, a traditional Korean dish, is one of the world's healthier local delicacies.
Mike Clarke/AFP/Getty ImagesKimchi, a traditional Korean dish, is one of the world's healthier local delicacies.
I’m in hospital to see my dad. He’s sitting up and chatting away like he’s propping up the bar at his local — but he’s here because his heart has failed. Dad drinks, smokes and eats a poor diet. The kind of diet I wouldn’t serve to a dog. But he is not alone. He is surrounded by some very sick people who are also in hospital because they have bad diets. My dad is skinny on his; most are large on theirs.
On the next ward, a patient is morbidly obese. He’s served hospital food three times a day and tops it up with snacks from the tuck trolley. Brimming with brightly packaged sugar and fat bullets with a shelf-life beyond the apocalypse, the trolley offers an array of saturated fats, hidden sugars, salt and thousands of ingredients that are more at home in a laboratory than a kitchen. He buys himself a selection for the day that most of us couldn’t eat in a week.
This is an extreme example, but it’s a snapshot of modern Britain. On the one hand, the food revolution of the past 50 years has brought us choice and convenience; on the other, we’re facing a global epidemic with obesity.
Now, I love food. It’s fuel, it’s medicine, and it’s delicious. So when I was asked to go on a journey to find the world’s best diet, I was excited. I eat pretty healthily, but I could definitely do better — and when my dad’s not looking, I’m nicking his Jaffa Cakes. So which countries hold the secret to a longer and healthier life? Might it just be possible that I could find a diet that will ultimately prolong my life? And will I still be able to eat the odd Jaffa Cake?
What I found along the way was not only surprising, it also had the potential to change my life. And if a few of these lessons could be applied on a national — or even global — scale, then they could help towards making the world a healthier place …


MARSHALL ISLANDS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC


Peering out of the airplane window, it looks as though we’re touching down in paradise: azure waters lapping a sun-soaked shore dotted with palm trees. But once the wheels sink into the greasy tarmac, it becomes quickly apparent that we have landed in one of the most obese places on the planet.
In 2013, the International Diabetes Federation found that more than 80% of the adult population is overweight. And you can see it. Baggage handlers, airport security and the chaps at passport control are all demonstrably carrying extra pounds. And with all this weight come some very grave consequences. The Marshallese have the third highest prevalence of diabetes in the world — 50% of people aged over 35 have the disease, and amputees can be seen island-wide as a result.
So where did it all go wrong? Fifty years ago, the Marshallese suddenly changed their diet. After the Second World War, the islands became a trust territory of the United States. The U.S. began trading with the islands, and as a result the Marshallese diet shifted from fresh fish and coconuts to an imported, processed “Western” diet of flour, white rice, sugar and fatty meats. And this is the diet they still eat today.
One evening I ate with a local family at home — mum, dad and five beautiful children. On the menu were two types of white rice — one with sugar and one without — and turkey tails. Turkey tails are essentially a turkey’s derriere. And, I quickly discovered as turkey fat dripped down my chin, they don’t pack much muscle in their trunk, since their tails can contain a staggering 73% fat. So much fat that they have been banned in countries such as Samoa.
And with a watermelon costing $38 in the local supermarket, there wasn’t a fruit or vegetable in sight. The island is a coral atoll, so growing fruit and vegetables is nigh-on impossible. And on the average wage of $2 an hour, imported fruit and vegetables are a luxury most people can’t afford.
Rice, flour, sugar and fatty meats are a lethal combination if you don’t add any fibre in the mix. Without it, diabetes is almost an inevitability.
SOUTH KOREA
It was way past my bedtime. Armed with a strategic power nap and a box of doughnuts, I shuffled up a back alley. Punctuated with neon, it was like something out of Blade Runner. I arrived at an apartment and a pretty, petite South Korean girl opened the door. Not the racy madam I was expecting. Hyo-Jin tucked the doughnuts under her arm and ushered me into her bedroom. She gave me a slick of red lipstick, smoked my eyes and tamed my mane. We were ready.
I was about to participate in something pretty radical. Eating alone in South Korea is a major social taboo. Mokbang is the antidote. It means “broadcast eating,” something that is taking the country by storm and is earning Hyo-Jin a small fortune. Her live stream is free to watch, but if people are happy with the service they can give a donation. We tucked into an array of South Korean delights: kimchi pancake, fried pork in soy, and something a little more familiar, fried chicken. In just an hour of eating on a webcam, we’d made a few hundred dollars.
With such a passion for food, it is perhaps surprising that South Koreans are some of the slimmest people on the planet. In 2012, a report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development found that they have the lowest level of obesity in the developed world. So why are they so healthy? Firstly, and very simply, they eat an inordinate amount of vegetables. They eat more than twice the amount of vegetables we do and grow enough to have 222 kg of vegetables per person available every year over our 94 kg. Instead of five a day, it’s more like 10 a day. Fresh and often raw vegetables are a staple everywhere, even at service stations. This is a far cry from our roadside Ginsters and packets of crisps.
Second, fermented foods are a major part of their diet. Kimchi — a spicy, fermented cabbage — is eaten at breakfast, lunch and dinner, with the average South Korean consuming a hefty 150g-200g per day in the winter, and 50 g-100g in the summertime. Packed with good bacteria called lactobacilli, it helps boost metabolism and aids digestion.
Fit to burst, I rolled out of Hui Jin’s flat. Feeling slightly objectified, I did genuinely believe, perhaps naively, that I had provided company at dinner for a few hundred solo eaters. I asked her what I should do about my bloated tummy. She had a one-word answer: “Kimchi.”
ITALY
Tucked away in the Italian countryside, just a couple of hours from Rome, stands a magical hilltop. Known by scientists as the “village of eternal youth,” the average life expectancy in Campodimele is 95 years. Compare that with the Italian average of 77.5 for men and 83.5 for women. In addition, their cholesterol levels are some of the healthiest in the world. In the Eighties, the World Health Organisation discovered that the cholesterol in 80?year-olds was similar to that of newborn babies.
Why are they living so long? There’s no doubt that they have longevity in their genes. Yet it’s what they do with those genes. I spent a day with Geraldo and Liana. They are 85 and 83 respectively, yet look and move like they’re at least 10 years younger.
I ask them to show me what they eat. Geraldo invites me on his Vespa, and I am half-expecting him to take me to the supermarket; instead, we roll down the hill to feed his chickens and check on his wheat fields. As for the supermarket, he laughs and tells me that the closest one is 50 kilometres away and he’s never been.
On returning home, his wife Liana is preparing lunch. A delicious rustic feast of pasta, passata, chickpeas, lashings of olive oil, and a substantial goblet of deep, fruity red wine poured from an old Evian bottle. The difference is that every single element is home-grown and homemade. Being almost completely self-sufficient, each week this couple spend a few euros on just two extras — milk and coffee.
Geraldo and Liana are not an exception to the rule. Professor Cugini has studied the town since the ’80s and refers to their diet as “hyper-Mediterranean.” It’s all the best bits of the Mediterranean diet, turned up full blast. The villagers enjoy top-quality, home-produced fresh ingredients that are packed full of vitamins and minerals. Their diet is low in meat and almost devoid of red meat and butter.
The people here consume an average of one litre of olive oil a week, the perfect recipe for heart health — washed down with two glasses of red wine a day to offer a daily injection of antioxidant polyphenols.
Despite running water and electricity, the people in Campodimele are living a life much as they would have done 1,000 years ago. This isn’t feasible for most of us, but if we all ate a little more like them, we might just feel the benefits.
One can only hope that somewhere in a parallel universe, the tuck trolley being wheeled around my dad’s hospital ward is loaded with a Campodimele harvest and, rather than crisps and chocolate, it is fresh vegetables and olive oil that are being administered.

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

HEALTH & WELLNESS: Low-carb, high-fat diet is best for weight loss, heart health, U.S. study says


Low-carb, high-fat diet is best for weight loss, heart health, U.S. study says

Limiting intake of processed foods, not saturated fats, should be the priority of both those who want to lose weight, and policy makers, health experts say, with sugar and carb intake linked more strongly to obesity and heart disease than any particular fats, including saturated ones.
Scott Olson/Getty Images filesLimiting intake of processed foods, not saturated fats, should be the priority of both those who want to lose weight, and policy makers, health experts say, with sugar and carb intake linked more strongly to obesity and heart disease than any particular fats, including saturated ones.
  •  
People who avoid carbohydrates and eat more fat, even saturated fat, lose more body fat and have fewer cardiovascular risks than people who follow the low-fat diet that health authorities have favored for decades, a major new study shows.
The findings are unlikely to be the final salvo in what has been a long and often contentious debate about what foods are best to eat for weight loss and overall health. The notion that dietary fat is harmful, particularly saturated fat, arose decades ago from comparisons of disease rates among large national populations.
But more recent clinical studies in which individuals and their diets were assessed over time have produced a more complex picture. Some have provided strong evidence that people can sharply reduce their heart disease risk by eating fewer carbohydrates and more dietary fat, with the exception of trans fats. The new findings suggest that this strategy more effectively reduces body fat and also lowers overall weight.
The new study was financed by the National Institutes of Health and published in theAnnals of Internal Medicine. It included a racially diverse group of 150 men and women — a rarity in clinical nutrition studies — who were assigned to follow diets for one year that limited either the amount of carbs or fat that they could eat, but not overall calories.
‘Cutting your carbs helps you lose weight without focusing on calories’
“To my knowledge, this is one of the first long-term trials that’s given these diets without calorie restrictions,” said Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, who was not involved in the new study. “It shows that in a free-living setting, cutting your carbs helps you lose weight without focusing on calories. And that’s really important because someone can change what they eat more easily than trying to cut down on their calories.”
Diets low in carbohydrates and higher in fat and protein have been commonly used for weight loss since Dr. Robert Atkins popularized the approach in the 1970s. Among the long-standing criticisms is that these diets cause people to lose weight in the form of water instead of body fat, and that cholesterol and other heart disease risk factors climb because dieters invariably raise their intake of saturated fat by eating more meat and dairy.
Many nutritionists and health authorities have “actively advised against” low-carbohydrate diets, said the lead author of the new study, Dr. Lydia A. Bazzano of the Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. “It’s been thought that your saturated fat is, of course, going to increase, and then your cholesterol is going to go up,” she said. “And then bad things will happen in general.”
People in the low-carbohydrate group lost about eight pounds more on average than those in the low-fat group
The new study showed that was not the case.
By the end of the year-long trial, people in the low-carbohydrate group had lost about eight pounds more on average than those in the low-fat group. They had significantly greater reductions in body fat than the low-fat group, and improvements in lean muscle mass — even though neither group changed their levels of physical activity.
While the low-fat group did lose weight, they appeared to lose more muscle than fat.
“They actually lost lean muscle mass, which is a bad thing,” Mozaffarian said. “Your balance of lean mass versus fat mass is much more important than weight. And that’s a very important finding that shows why the low-carb, high-fat group did so metabolically well.”
The high-fat group followed something of a modified Atkins diet. They were told to eat mostly protein and fat, and to choose foods with primarily unsaturated fats, like fish, olive oil and nuts. But they were allowed to eat foods higher in saturated fat as well, including cheese and red meat.
Low-carb participants were encouraged to cook with olive and canola oils, but butter was allowed, too
A typical day’s diet was not onerous: It might consist of eggs for breakfast, tuna salad for lunch, and some kind of protein for dinner — like red meat, chicken, fish, pork or tofu — along with vegetables. Low-carb participants were encouraged to cook with olive and canola oils, but butter was allowed, too.
Overall, they took in a little more than 13% of their daily calories from saturated fat, more than double the 5% to 6% limit recommended by the American Heart Association. The majority of their fat intake, however, was unsaturated fats.
The low-fat group included more grains, cereals and starches in their diet. They reduced their total fat intake to less than 30% of their daily calories, which is in line with the federal government’s dietary guidelines. The other group increased their total fat intake to more than 40% of daily calories.
Both groups were encouraged to eat vegetables, and the low-carbohydrate group was told that eating some beans and fresh fruit was fine as well.
In the end, people in the low-carbohydrate group saw markers of inflammation and triglycerides — a type of fat that circulates in the blood — plunge. Their HDL, the so-called good cholesterol, rose more sharply than it did for people in the low-fat group.
Blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL, the so-called bad cholesterol, stayed about the same for people in each group.
Nonetheless, those on the low-carbohydrate diet ultimately did so well that they managed to lower their Framingham risk scores, which calculate the likelihood of a heart attack within the next 10 years. The low-fat group on average had no improvement in their scores.
The decrease in risk on the low-carboydrate diet “should translate into a substantial benefit,” said Dr. Allan Sniderman, a professor of cardiology at McGill University in Montreal.
One important predictor of heart disease that the study did not assess, Sniderman said, was the relative size and number of LDL particles in the bloodstream. Two people can have the same overall LDL concentration, but very different levels of risk depending on whether they have a lot of small, dense LDL particles or a small number of large and fluffy particles.
Eating refined carbohydrates tends to raise the overall number of LDL particles and shift them toward the small, dense variety, which contributes to atherosclerosis. Saturated fat tends to make LDL particles larger, more buoyant and less likely to clog arteries, at least when carbohydrate intake is not high, said Dr. Ronald M. Krauss, former chairman of the American Heart Association’s dietary guidelines committee.


Small, dense LDL is the kind typically found in heart patients and in people who have high triglycerides, central obesity and other aspects of the metabolic syndrome, said Krauss, who is also the director of atherosclerosis research at Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute.

“I’ve been a strong advocate of moving saturated fat down the list of priorities in dietary recommendations for one reason: because of the increasing importance of metabolic syndrome and the role that carbohydrates play,” Krauss said.
Health authorities should pivot away from fat restrictions and encourage people to eat fewer processed foods
Mozaffarian said the research suggested that health authorities should pivot away from fat restrictions and encourage people to eat fewer processed foods, particularly those with refined carbohydrates.
The average person may not pay much attention to the federal dietary guidelines, but their influence can be seen, for example, in school lunch programs, which is why many schools forbid whole milk but serve their students fat-free chocolate milk loaded with sugar, Mozaffarian said.

FOOD FORMULATIONS: Diet Beverages: Encouraging Unhealthy Selections?

Formulating Foods explores the latest health and nutrition news and research—as well as the latest ingredient and food application innovations—to determine what consumers want (and need) from the food and beverage products they consume, and how industry can make it happen. 

Diet Beverages: Encouraging Unhealthy Selections?
 - Blog
Print


New research from Texas Christian University (TCU) suggests that drinking beverages sweetened with non-caloric sweeteners—versus drinking water or a sugar-sweetened beverage—may encourage unhealthy diet choices.
For the study, published this month in the journal Appetite, researchers conducted three experiments in which 116 participants ages 18 to 25 years were randomly given an unmarked cup filled with either a non-caloric sweetened beverage (a diet soda), a sugar-sweetened beverage (regular soda) or non-sweetened beverage (sparkling water). Researchers then measured their cognition, snack choices and responses to sugary food.

In the first experiment, the diet soda drinkers were faster to identify the names of high-calorie foods (like hamburger or milkshake) than participants who drank a non-sweetened or sugar-sweetened beverage. “There was no difference among the groups in identifying the words of low-calorie foods like ‘apple’ or ‘carrot’," said study author Sarah Hill, associate professor of psychology, TCU. Hill suggested these results may indicate that diet beverages “prime you to choose unhealthy food items. Those foods are on your mind."

In the second experiment, participants—who were told they were taking part in a consumer product study—were given the choice to take home a bag of chocolate candy, a pack of sugar-free gum or a bottle of spring water. The diet soda drinkers were significantly more likely to choose the high-calorie candy than were the participants who had regular soda or sparkling water.

Finally, to test participants’ response to sugar, researchers had the volunteers eat as many cookies as they wanted and then report on their satisfaction. “We found that drinking a diet drink didn’t change how many cookies they ate," Hill said, “but the participants who had the diet drink did report feeling less satisfied after eating."
But don’t think sugary beverages get a free pass.

Hill notes that, in the sugar response experiment, there was no difference in the number of cookies eaten by those who drank regular soda and plain water. “People just don’t seem to compensate for the calories consumed in a beverage," Hill said. “Even if we consciously think about it, a less deliberate part of our mind might not really register those calories."

Sweetening beverages has presented its share of challenges—sugar-sweetened beverages have been blamed as lead contributors of the obesity epidemic, while non-nutritive sweeteners have been blamed for weight gain and increased cravings. As pressure continues to mount on nationwide sugars intake (as with FDA’s recent proposal to include “added sugars" on the Nutrition Facts panel), product designers are forced to find ingredients that can reduce calories and maintain the sensory qualities consumers seek, often in “natural," clean-label solutions.
The Food Product Design FoodTech Toolbox recently took a close look at the sweeteners landscape in this freereport, to help mitigate some of these challenges that come with reducing sugar content in products. 

Monday, 1 September 2014

HEALTHY SUPERFOODS: Three farmers’ market superfoods that pack a vitamin punch

A nightshade related to the tomato, the tomatillo is meant to be eaten green, offers a tart flavour that goes well in spicy dishes, and helps the keep the calories down while packing significant vitamin content.
FotoliaA nightshade related to the tomato, the tomatillo is meant to be eaten green, offers a tart flavour that goes well in spicy dishes, and helps the keep the calories down while packing significant vitamin content.

We are heading into the peak of farmers’ market season, and from apricots to zucchinis, strawberries to scallions, you can find every colour of the rainbow, much of it grown nearby, and the bounty feels endless — at least for a few more weeks. So now is a great time to experiment! Here are a few of the less than common foods you might want to try:
CURRANTS: Native to Europe, currants are most commonly found in red and black varieties. At just 63 calories per cup, they provide fewer calories than bananas, apples, and even blueberries, and provide 77% of your daily requirements for vitamin C per serving, along with 15% of your vitamin K, and 5 grams of fibre. Currants can be stored in the refrigerator for several days after picking, but should be firm, bright, and shiny when picked or purchased. While they are tart, that doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy currants on their own; some who grow accustomed to eating less sugar in their diets find they come to enjoy less-sweet fruit over time. More commonly, however, currants are used to make desserts, jams, jellies and chutneys.
GOOSEBERRIES: A member of the same family as currants, European gooseberries are typically a light green fruit with a translucent skin. Not to be confused with the Chinese gooseberry, or kiwi, European gooseberries thrive in cooler temperatures, making them a logical choice for Canadian growers. Nutritionally, gooseberries are similar to currants, providing 66 calories’ worth of energy per cup, along with a mighty 6 grams of fibre per serving (that’s a quarter of a days’ worth for an adult female), as well as more than two-thirds of an adult’s vitamin C for the day. Gooseberries can be eaten raw or added to pies and other desserts, but like many thin-skinned fruits, they are often picked before they are fully ripe; look for berries that give slightly with gentle pressure and enjoy the sweetest, ripest fruit right away.
TOMATILLOS: A member of the same nightshade family that includes tomatoes, bell peppers and potatoes, tomatillos resemble a small tomato, but with a thin, crepe-like skin surrounding them. Ironically, tomatillos are closely related to gooseberries — but not the European kind. Instead, this member of the Physalis genus are related to a type of gooseberry known as the cape gooseberry, or ground cherry — both are surrounded by that distinctive, non-edible husk, known as a calyx. If you’re watching your weight, tomatillos are a great choice: one medium fruit (yes, they’re technically a fruit) provides just 11 calories’ worth of energy, or about 42 calories per cup. A cup of tomatillos also provides at least 10% of your daily needs for vitamin B3, C, and K, as well as potassium, along with 3 grams of fibre. Unlike tomatoes, tomatillos are eaten green, and retain a tart flavour that is a classic in many Mexican dishes and sauces.
-Jennifer Sygo, MSc., RD, is a registered dietitian and sports nutritionist at Cleveland Clinic Canada, and author of the newly released nutrition book Unmasking Superfoods, (HarperCollins, $19.99). Visit her on the Web at jennifersygo.com and send your comments and nutrition-related questions to her at info@jennifersygo.com.